|
Upfront
...................
|
May 3, 2004 “Does
it make sense to use an interest-only loan to buy the home of our dreams? We
feel that is the only way we will be able to afford it. We are near retirement
age and will have significant equity in the house, but our income isn’t large
enough to afford more than the interest payment. I feel that in case of an
emergency, we could apply for a reverse mortgage.” It
does make sense, but the reverse mortgage should be made an explicit part of
your plan, not just an emergency backup. You can’t make interest-only (IO)
payments forever, so you want to pay off the loan with proceeds from a reverse
mortgage before the IO period ends. As far as I
know, the longest interest-only period available today is 10
years. If you take a 30-year loan that is IO for 10 years, in month 121 your
payment will rise to become fully-amortizing. The new payment will have
to be large enough to pay off the loan over the next
20 years. That
should not be a problem if you and your spouse are older than 52 now and
have significant equity in the house. You will become eligible for a
reverse mortgage at 62, before your mortgage
payment increases. You pay off the loan with the
proceeds of a reverse mortgage, and hopefully have enough equity left
over to do some traveling or send a grandkid to college. WARNING: Most IOs today are adjustable rate, which involves the risk that the payment may increase markedly well before the IO period is over. You are not in a position to take this risk, which means you must have a fixed-rate IO. Copyright
Jack Guttentag 2004 |