Mortgage to Purchase, or Afterwards?
December 19, 2005, Revised January 25, 2006, Revised March 10, 2006
"I have enough cash to swing a all-cash purchase if I want, but I don’t
want all my money tied up in the house, I want to get some of it back in
a mortgage. What is the down side of paying cash and taking out the
mortgage later versus taking out the mortgage at the time of purchase?"
The Case For Paying Cash and Refinancing Afterwards
It is more difficult to shop effectively for a purchase mortgage than
for a refinance. Borrowers purchasing a house are faced with a closing
date on which they must provide funding to complete the purchase. This
means that at some point in the process there is not enough time for the
purchaser to back out of a deal and start anew with another loan
provider. Once past that point, they are vulnerable to a variety of
tricks by unscrupulous loan providers that can cost them dearly.
In contrast, the refinancing borrower who feels badly treated by a loan
provider can opt out of the deal at any point and start again with
another loan provider. Usually, timing is not critical on a refinance.
Even after a loan closes, a borrower refinancing with any lender other
than his current lender, has 3 days to rescind it. The lender must then
return all fees and remove any liens on their property. This right is
not granted to loans used to purchase or construct a house.
The Case For Borrowing to Purchase
Cash-out Refinances Are Priced Higher: One downside of taking the
mortgage after you have purchased the house is that the mortgage will
then be classified as a "cash-out refinance" as opposed to a "purchase
mortgage". Why does that matter? Cash-out refinance loans are viewed as
riskier than purchase loans, and therefore are priced higher. On prime
loans, the rate difference is about 1/8%. On riskier loans, the
difference can be larger.
Only a small proportion of those who take cash-out refinances have
houses that don’t already have a mortgage, as in your case. Most have a
mortgage and want to raise cash, and some of those are in financial
distress and end up in default. That’s why cash-out refinances have
higher loss rates than purchase mortgages, and are charged a higher
price.
Points Paid on a Cash-out Refinance May Not Be Deductible: On a purchase
loan, points are wholly deductible in the transaction year. On a
refinance points must be prorated over the term of the loan unless the
proceeds are used to improve the house.
Cash-out Refinances Are Not Protected Against Deficiency Judgments: In
some states (including California), if a purchase mortgage goes into
foreclosure and the property value is not sufficient to make the lender
whole, the lender cannot obtain a deficiency judgment that allows it to
go after the borrower’s other assets. The borrower has no such
protection on a refinance.
Title Insurance Costs Are Higher on a Cash-out Refinance. The borrower
purchasing title insurance when buying the property will nonetheless
have to buy a policy for the lender when refinancing. Typically, the two
policies purchased separately will cost more than two purchased
together.
Borrower Loses Lender Protection on a Cash-out Refinance. Having a
lender involved in a purchase decision can sometimes save the borrower
some grief. An example is the purchaser of a condominium who discovers
that the project does not meet the lender’s guidelines for reasons that
are as relevant to the buyer as to the lender. For example, too many
units in the project remain unsold.
Best of Both Worlds?
I must mention the possibility of getting the best of both worlds, even
though I am not yet sure how many borrowers can take advantage of it.
Irving Steinman, a mortgage broker in Los Angeles, tells me that he has
brokered many “technical refinances” which must occur within 90 days of
the purchase. These are viewed as purchase loans by both the lender and
IRS. Readers who can provide more information about technical refinances
are invited to write me.