No Bailouts If You Overpaid For a House
February 19, 2007
"After being in my house for a year, I learned that the market value is
considerably less than the appraised value. I was obviously deceived by
the builder and the appraiser. Who do I talk to about that?
My mortgage was for the full appraised value. I want to stay in my
house, but I don’t want to pay for a mortgage than is for more than the
house is worth. Is there any way I can get the lender to reduce my note
to the real value of the house?
I thought I might sell but the new appraisal is for considerably less
than the mortgage balance."
You may have paid more than the house was worth at the time, builders
typically charge what the traffic will bear. There is no law against
charging more than something is worth if a buyer is willing to pay it.
Being unduly influenced by an appraiser working for a builder is a
terrible mistake, but an understandable one for a home buyer to make. It
is less excusable when made by a lender, who is supposed to know better.
An alternative and perhaps more plausible explanation is that you bought
when prices in your area were at their peak, you paid the market price
at the time, but prices have since tumbled. Nobody is to blame for that,
house prices usually rise but occasionally they drop, and you were
unlucky enough to be caught by one.
One of the reasons I advise people to avoid 100% loans if they possibly
can is that a price drop is always possible. If it happens, you owe more
than the house is worth, making the mortgage payment a torment, and a
sale impossible without finding another source of cash.
The lender is not voluntarily going to share your torment by writing
down the size of the mortgage. If your house had appreciated, you
wouldn’t have shared the capital gain with the lender, and now that it
has depreciated, the lender is not going to share the capital loss with
you.
Of course, if you default the lender will indeed share your capital
loss, but it will be involuntary. For your sake, I hope that doesn’t
happen.