You may have paid more than the house was
worth at the time, builders typically charge what the traffic will bear. There
is no law against charging more than something is worth if a buyer is willing to
pay it. Being unduly influenced by an appraiser working for a builder is a
terrible mistake, but an understandable one for a home buyer to make. It is less
excusable when made by a lender, who is supposed to know better.
An alternative and perhaps more plausible
explanation is that you bought when prices in your area were at their peak, you
paid the market price at the time, but prices have since tumbled. Nobody is to
blame for that, house prices usually rise but occasionally they drop, and you
were unlucky enough to be caught by one.
One of the reasons I advise people to avoid
100% loans if they possibly can is that a price drop is always possible. If it
happens, you owe more than the house is worth, making the mortgage payment a
torment, and a sale impossible without finding another source of cash.
The lender is not voluntarily going to share
your torment by writing down the size of the mortgage. If your house had
appreciated, you wouldn’t have shared the capital gain with the lender, and now
that it has depreciated, the lender is not going to share the capital loss with
you.
Of course, if you default the lender will
indeed share your capital loss, but it will be involuntary. For your sake, I
hope that doesn’t happen.
Copyright Jack Guttentag 2007