A reverse mortgage
is a loan to an elderly homeowner on which the borrower’s debt rises
over time, but which need not be repaid until the borrower dies, sells
the house, or moves out permanently. The role of the reverse mortgage is
to put more money in the pockets of seniors by allowing equity depletion
while they are still alive.
The “forward” mortgages that are used to purchase homes build equity –
the value of the home less the mortgage balance. Borrowers pay down the
balance over time, and by age 62, when they become eligible for a
reverse mortgage, loan balances are either paid off or much reduced.
Reverse mortgages, in contrast, consume equity because loan balances
rise over time. If there is a balance remaining on a forward mortgage at
the time a reverse mortgage is taken out, it is paid off with an advance
under the reverse mortgage.
Virtually all of the reverse
mortgages written today are insured by FHA under the Home Equity
Conversion Mortgage (HECM) program authorized by Congress in 1988. FHA
insures the lender against loss in the event the loan balance at
termination exceeds the value of the property. It also insures the
borrower that any payments due from the lender will be made, even if the
lender fails.
The HECM program
began slowly, with only 157 loans written in 1990, but by 2000, the
number had grown to 6600. In 2009, about 130,000 HECMs will be
originated. The reverse mortgage market seems to have come of age.
However, the financial crisis has taken its toll.
On the positive
side, the reverse mortgage market has not been impacted by the
crisis-induced tightening of credit standards that has plagued the
market for forward mortgages. There are no credit requirements for
reverse mortgages. Similarly, the requirement that all forward mortgage
borrowers must fully document their incomes has not affected reverse
mortgage borrowers who are not subject to income requirements.
For a time, the
HECM program served as a “demonstration”, stimulating the development of
private programs. Just before the crisis, I counted 7 such programs.
They are now all gone.
The cause was a
loss of funding. Private reverse mortgages were all securitized and when
the private mortgage securities market collapsed, the relatively small
part of it directed to reverse mortgages collapsed with it. The
originators of private reverse mortgages had no place to sell them.
The major focus of
the private programs had been the high end of the market that the HECM
program did not serve well because of FHA loan limits. The private
programs had allowed owners of higher-value houses to borrow larger
amounts than were possible with a HECM. Their loss left a hole in the
market.
Seniors with
properties of modest value who, prior to the crisis, were not
constrained by FHA loan limits, found their HECM borrowing power
reduced. If a house declines in value by 30%, the amount that can be
borrowed against it also decline by 30%.
Losses to FHA from
insuring HECMs arise when loan balances come to exceed property values.
If home prices are rising, as they were until 2006, most HECMs will
terminate before this loss point is reached, and FHA’s insurance
premiums generate net profits for the Government. The sharp decline in
house values since 2006, however, is converting those profits into
losses. In response, on September 23, HUD announced a 10 percent
reduction in the percent of property values that seniors can borrow. A
second decline may be in the cards.
Fannie Mae had been
the major source of HECM funding since the program began, but the
financial crisis raised doubts about whether this would continue. In
September, 2008, the heavy losses suffered by Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac, much of it related to their investments in sub-prime mortgage
securities, forced the Government to place the agencies in
conservatorship. They are now wards of the Government with a very
uncertain future.
To de-emphasize its
role and hopefully attract other investors, Fannie Mae in March
increased its rate margins on adjustable rate HECMs. This shocked many
seniors because higher rate margins reduce the amounts they can borrow,
and it traumatized many lenders who had to explain the bad news to
seniors who had HECMs in process.
To date, no private
investors have come forward, but Ginnie Mae, a Federal agency that
insures securities issued against FHA and VA forward mortgages, has been
filling the gap. It began its program of insuring HECM securities in
2007, and is gradually expanding into the space being vacated by Fannie
Mae.
Actions taken by
the Congress as part of broader efforts to support the housing market
have partly offset the adverse consequences of the financial crisis. In
2008, the system of setting maximum loan amounts on HECMs for each
county was replaced
by
a uniform national limit of $417,000. Early in 2009, the limit was
raised temporarily (through 2010) to $625,500. This has helped fill the
void left by the loss of private reverse mortgage programs.
In addition,
Congress authorized a “HECM for Purchase” program under which seniors
could buy a house with a reverse mortgage, and a fixed-rate HECM
well-suited for seniors looking to purchase a house. These programs are
discussed next week.