Changing the Way Home Mortgages Are Delivered: The Certified Lender Network
January 17, 2011, Updated January 1, 2012

The failure of Government to fix the deep-seated problems of the home loan market raises the question of whether there is a private initiative that would work better? I believe there is and will spell it out in a series of 5 articles. This is the first. 

These articles served as a blueprint for the Certified Lender Network (CLN) that was under development at the time they were written early in 2011. The CLN became operational early in 2012. Check the menu to the right of this page. 

The Challenge  

One major problem facing mortgage borrowers is finding the best price for which they qualify. The product and the process are complex and vulnerable to all manner of deception. Some deceptions are so widespread and ingrained that they are part of mortgage banking culture.

It is equally difficult to find competitive prices on required third party services, including title insurance and mortgage insurance. These and other third party providers are usually selected by the lenders, who base their selection on the services they receive from the service provider, rather than on the prices paid by the borrower.

The second major problem is the lack of knowledge and understanding by borrowers faced with the need to make critical decisions, including the type of mortgage and mortgage options that best meet their needs. Efforts to address this problem by education are complicated by the wide diversity in borrower capacities.

Extensive efforts by Government, including mandatory disclosures and regulation, have largely failed to help borrowers. Whatever help has been provided by mandated disclosures of information useful to borrowers has been nullified by the increased confusions arising from the torrent of mandated disclosures that are useless and misleading.

The proposed approach for dealing with these problems is a third party mortgage network that would certify participating lenders and other service providers. The network would attract borrowers because of the information and protections they offer, which gives the network the clout to set the operating rules required for certification. 

Early Private Networks  

In 1997 and 1998, Intuit and Microsoft as well as three smaller firms moved rapidly to stake out positions in what was then seen to be a market ripe for massive growth: the origination of home mortgages on the internet by independent third parties hosting multiple lenders. These sites allowed potential borrowers to shop prices conveniently among lenders competing for their business.

I was an enthusiastic proponent of these multi-lender web sites, extolling their advantages to borrowers in published articles. The software company I started, GHR Systems Inc, developed the technology used by Intuit. It was state-of-the-art at the time.

The premise underlying the shopping sites was “if we make it easy and convenient for borrowers to shop, they will come”. They did come, attracted by the up-to-date market information the sites provided – prices on the Intuit site were updated every 10 minutes, which was mind-boggling at the time. However, very few borrowers stayed to transact. All the sites failed and were terminated except one, which converted to a single-lender site.

One obvious explanation for their failure is that the sites were premature in the sense that consumers had not yet become comfortable transacting on-line. This is much less the case today, which substantially improves the prospects for the next generation of sites.

In addition, the earliest sites did not assure potential borrowers that they would receive competitive pricing, even though that was the intention. Displaying price quotes of multiple lenders on-line is not enough to assure that transactions will be competitively priced, an important point discussed in the second article in this series, Providing Competitive Loan Pricing. The borrowers who viewed the first generation sites as a convenient source of price information which could be used just as effectively shopping off-line, were probably right.    

Lead-Generation Sites

The next generation of sites focused on giving borrowers what many borrowers seemed to want: multiple lenders soliciting them for business. The sites ask borrowers for much less than the shopping sites, which qualified borrowers. Lead generation sites collect just enough information to add up to a marketable lead, which is then sold to 3 or 4 loan providers who contact the borrowers.

Lead generation sites have been commercially successful because they ask little of the borrower, the technology they require is relatively simple and cheap, and they offer a service that some borrowers find appealing. These borrowers buy into the slogan “When banks compete, you win”, not realizing that they are equally likely to lose. The leads are sold not to the lenders who will offer the best prices to the borrower but to those who will pay the most for the lead. Price low-balling – the practice of quoting a price the lender has no intention of delivering – is endemic on these sites, and the sites provide little or no decision support.

A successful private network would actually deal with borrower problems, as opposed to pretending to deal with them as lead generation sites do.

Go to the second article in this series, Providing Competitive Loan Pricing.

Sign up to Receive New Articles
Print